Robert Adamant - go to this post

categorically pathetic

I'm afraid this is quite the inadequate response given the volume of evidence that stands against you. You are demonstrating a lack of respect for the proceedings of these boards, a crime which will be added to the running total. It's not looking good for you, boyo.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

My apology has been and will always be that I am to be admired and rewarded for my invaluable contributions to every forum I contribute to.
This has done me well enough as an apology so far and I do not ever intend to change my position.

By virtue of the act of apologizing, you are answering to my accusations. Let this be taken into account as an admission of guilt, and tacked onto the case as a whole.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

apology doesn't mean an admission of guilt, it means a defense, most people are just pussies that never have a defense and immediately admit guilt for wrongdoing.
It's perfectly valid for an apology to be a claim that one is not guilty. It happens constantly.

Would you be apologize for something you are accused and didn't? No you would not feel bad for
.

Moderation - go to this post

Would you be apologize for something you are accused and didn't? No you would not feel bad for
.

Evidence doesn't indicate a crime, I have no reason to dispute the objective history. What I take issue with is how people interpret that history.
My apology is that you ought to interpret that history in such a way that compels you to treat me as a divine being worthy of all gifts and admiration.

What you might be having trouble with is assuming that I would submit to the convention of apologies universally being that of admitting guilt and remorse.
I see no cause for doing something like that in this circumstance.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

apology doesn't mean an admission of guilt, it means a defense, most people are just pussies that never have a defense and immediately admit guilt for wrongdoing.
It's perfectly valid for an apology to be a claim that one is not guilty. It happens constantly.

apology
noun
apol·​o·​gy ə-ˈpä-lə-jē
plural apologies
: an admission of error or discourtesy accompanied by an expression of regret
Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apology

Sorry cockbert, but you're not about to win an argument on semantics on these here boards. As seen here, apology does in fact imply fault or guilt on the part of the one apologizing. And no, a defense and an apology are two different things, retard. You don't apologize for something of which you aren't guilty. Your behavior is a sign of a guilty conscience. Not surprising that you are unable to suppress your subconscious impulses, you being a mere beast.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Evidence doesn't indicate a crime, I have no reason to dispute the objective history. What I take issue with is how people interpret that history.
My apology is that you ought to interpret that history in such a way that compels you to treat me as a divine being worthy of all gifts and admiration.

What you might be having trouble with is assuming that I would submit to the convention of apologies universally being that of admitting guilt and remorse.
I see no cause for doing something like that in this circumstance.

So, you don't in fact deny the evidence presented thus far. Good. We're finally getting somewhere. It's not a matter of how the evidence is interpreted, that's up to the forum's users and administration team, not me, not you. I've merely presented the evidence showing your debauchery and flagrant disregard for the rules, and you've admitted guilt via apology and confirmed the authenticity of the evidence. Now we simply sit back, relax, and await your ass beating at the behest of grapemin.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

It's not my fault Merriam Webster never read Plato.
If you had it wouldn't be such an absurd use of the word.

Hey bonehead, what is more relevant to the definition of a word in modern English? A Greek who has been dead for millennia or a modern dictionary which is regularly updated and maintained? That's a rhetorical question by the way.

You're just trying to veil yourself behind a flimsy shroud of esoterism. Sorry, everyone else can see right through your little facade. You are the laughingstock of the forum. Grow up.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

My understanding of the english language because you are talking to me.
I don't care if it's rhetorical that's the truth.

Your understanding of the English language is utterly irrelevant. If you don't understand the English language, that is your problem. It's not my responsibility to cater to a moron who refuses to speak proper English. You're not special just because you refuse to acknowledge the actual definition of a word which everyone else agrees on. It just makes you look like an idiot.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Then you are simply unable to have any discussion. You lack the functional fluency of actually talking to someone.
You effectively know a collection of individual words but have no ability to connect them with broader concepts and contexts.

No? You are unable to have any discussion because you refuse to use the English language in the way it is commonly agreed upon to be used. This is off-topic and you're detracting from the point. You are guilty of everything I have accused you of. You've broken the forum's very reasonable and rather forgiving global files and thus need to be suspended.

@admin are you going to ice this fool or what?