My ban will be seen as nothing more than inferiors being insulted for making their inferiority clear

justin - go to this post

LOL! This thread hasn't been edited to censor this yet?

There isn't anything to be censored. Names of members of the forum? Why would there be any reason to censor this?

KhalafReload - go to this post

There isn't anything to be censored. Names of members of the forum? Why would there be any reason to censor this?

I've seen accounts get deleted in mere picoseconds when they even mention you-know-who's name. I'm sure you know this by now since you are just a façade for him.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Young people are talking to me. Pedophile is not the problem people should be worrying about.
I am literally trying to create a religion, talking to very agreeable young women would be the best possible way to do that.
I have no interest in having them genetically reproduce with me, I'm only concerned with them memetically reproducing.
So long as the internet is functional and I have a heartbeat I can spread quickly and globally.

..? Please debunk the time you were jacking off naked with a picture of a "young girl" on your screen. You've got a huuuuge erection!

justin - go to this post

..? Please debunk the time you were jacking off naked with a picture of a "young girl" on your screen. You've got a huuuuge erection!

it was solicited, in context of the relationship not extreme and private. i have a huge erection because I have a huge cock.

KhalafReload - go to this post

We shouldn't be worried that you're a pedophile?

Because it's a red hearing. Edit: sorry mixed metaphors. Point is it's not the thing that would actually be meaningfully concerning if you wanted to have a productive conversation about any potential wrongdoing.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

i have a huge erection because I have a huge cock.

no comment

After having read this dumpster fire of a conversation, I must reluctantly agree with the forum community's clear unanimous consensus. This guy is obviously a disgusting pedophile, assuming the evidence posted on the forum is genuine. I understand and fully condone the administrative action taken against this person on what I assume is some discord server which lies in close proximity to the forum. What I can't fathom is why this man is still allowed to use the site. He has clearly broken the global rules as he has broken several federal US statutes which prohibit the sexual communications that he has had with these underage users. Having underage users around to begin with is a terrible idea, and a recipe for disaster, as can be clearly observed in the wake of this incident. Back to the point, there is clear grounds to ban this individual, and what's more, there is a moral obligation to do so. We shouldn't be giving pedophiles a platform to speak and defend their aberrant, universally shunned behaviors. I'm disturbed that this Robert guy can so nonchalantly sit here and defend literal pedophilia like it's perfectly acceptable and justifiable. It makes me sick to my stomach and I'm certain that even with all of the edgelording around here, I'm not the only one. If this person's accounts aren't suspended across the board, and for good measure their IP address should be blocked as well, then that raises serious questions about the intentions and character of the administration team.