Robert Adamant - go to this post

On a tautological basis it's false but that's the point of claiming that there was an error.
Like yes if some authority says rules were broken then the rules have been broken.
If I believe that is wrong then I have to argue against the accusation.
It's absurd to assume that simply because someone said something bad happened it must dogmatically be believed.

…except that your violation of the rules is not justified solely by the word of an authority figure. It can be demonstrated how you did indeed break the rules, and I believe that I have aptly demonstrated such. Furthermore, no part of my argument relies upon "someone said something bad happened" other than in where I appeal to the several people who were witness to your posts on the server. There are also screenshots of your posts on the server, so the character of the witnesses, or the fact that there are witnesses, is not the fundamental basis for my statement.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

to a blind man no words are written.

Then you have no purpose for being and I invite you to resign.

1. No maxims will undermine what is obvious to myself and to any others who choose to read and/or partake in this thread.
2. My being is justified by my own convictions, which do exist and yet are not relevant to the nature of this argument, which is about rules that have been written in stone, one of which appeals to the laws of the country in which we both reside.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

I don't have to admit any of your evidence either

You are appealing to a legal system which is not said to exist on this platform. In fact, the judgment is on behalf of the mods and admins based on the logical conclusion of this argument, and I don't think you will ever win an appeal. Your ego prohibits you from actual remorse, and for this reason, nobody is going to want you back on the server.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

If you are concerned with the legality I implore you to help me by giving a better course of reform than "I hate you and I have reason to hate you because I hate you".

Exactly. You've bungled your case. I'm not going to roll over just because everyone else is incompetent. Especially when there's no soft belly of evil I can expose.

Since this response consists of nothing more than outlandish rhetoric, I don't intend to entertain you any further. I have refuted any argument which you may have made in your original post, and it is clearly demonstrated that you indeed violate the Global Rules. Furthermore, I am confident that any person who appeals to logic will agree with my assessment of things.

There are entire threads of pictures of your messages, not to mention your penis. I think there is plenty of evidence. At this point, it would suit you best to apologize for your actions, and not like the half-assed apology you wrote for the 3 girls on the server. You should apologize to all those who had to put up with you on the server, which is more than just those 3 girls.

This thread is such a fucking mess but it's clear to me that Robert shouldn't be taken seriously and you guys are wasting your time by arguing with him.

justin - go to this post

LOL! This thread hasn't been edited to censor this yet?

There isn't anything to be censored. Names of members of the forum? Why would there be any reason to censor this?

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Pedophile is not the problem people should be worrying about.

We shouldn't be worried that you're a pedophile?

why come that robert doewsn't talk in his stupid bullshit language when he watns other ppl to underst and what he saysding?

After having read this dumpster fire of a conversation, I must reluctantly agree with the forum community's clear unanimous consensus. This guy is obviously a disgusting pedophile, assuming the evidence posted on the forum is genuine. I understand and fully condone the administrative action taken against this person on what I assume is some discord server which lies in close proximity to the forum. What I can't fathom is why this man is still allowed to use the site. He has clearly broken the global rules as he has broken several federal US statutes which prohibit the sexual communications that he has had with these underage users. Having underage users around to begin with is a terrible idea, and a recipe for disaster, as can be clearly observed in the wake of this incident. Back to the point, there is clear grounds to ban this individual, and what's more, there is a moral obligation to do so. We shouldn't be giving pedophiles a platform to speak and defend their aberrant, universally shunned behaviors. I'm disturbed that this Robert guy can so nonchalantly sit here and defend literal pedophilia like it's perfectly acceptable and justifiable. It makes me sick to my stomach and I'm certain that even with all of the edgelording around here, I'm not the only one. If this person's accounts aren't suspended across the board, and for good measure their IP address should be blocked as well, then that raises serious questions about the intentions and character of the administration team.