Apology to esoteric discord

Tags
 
Labels
Members allowed to view this conversation
Everyone

Robert Adamant - go to this post

On a tautological basis it's false but that's the point of claiming that there was an error.
Like yes if some authority says rules were broken then the rules have been broken.
If I believe that is wrong then I have to argue against the accusation.
It's absurd to assume that simply because someone said something bad happened it must dogmatically be believed.

…except that your violation of the rules is not justified solely by the word of an authority figure. It can be demonstrated how you did indeed break the rules, and I believe that I have aptly demonstrated such. Furthermore, no part of my argument relies upon "someone said something bad happened" other than in where I appeal to the several people who were witness to your posts on the server. There are also screenshots of your posts on the server, so the character of the witnesses, or the fact that there are witnesses, is not the fundamental basis for my statement.


The Arbitrator - go to this post

Furthermore, no part of my argument relies upon "someone said something bad happened"

with a case in which no evidence is put forth that is all it could ever amount to

I don't have to admit any of your evidence either


Robert Adamant - go to this post

to a blind man no words are written.

Then you have no purpose for being and I invite you to resign.

  1. No maxims will undermine what is obvious to myself and to any others who choose to read and/or partake in this thread.
  2. My being is justified by my own convictions, which do exist and yet are not relevant to the nature of this argument, which is about rules that have been written in stone, one of which appeals to the laws of the country in which we both reside.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

I don't have to admit any of your evidence either

You are appealing to a legal system which is not said to exist on this platform. In fact, the judgment is on behalf of the mods and admins based on the logical conclusion of this argument, and I don't think you will ever win an appeal. Your ego prohibits you from actual remorse, and for this reason, nobody is going to want you back on the server.


The Arbitrator - go to this post

2. My being is justified by my own convictions, which do exist and yet are not relevant to the nature of this argument, which is about rules that have been written in stone, one of which appeals to the laws of the country in which we both reside.

If you are concerned with the legality I implore you to help me by giving a better course of reform than "I hate you and I have reason to hate you because I hate you".

The Arbitrator - go to this post

You are appealing to a legal system which is not said to exist on this platform.

Exactly. You've bungled your case. I'm not going to roll over just because everyone else is incompetent. Especially when there's no soft belly of evil I can expose.


Robert Adamant - go to this post

If you are concerned with the legality I implore you to help me by giving a better course of reform than "I hate you and I have reason to hate you because I hate you".

Exactly. You've bungled your case. I'm not going to roll over just because everyone else is incompetent. Especially when there's no soft belly of evil I can expose.

Since this response consists of nothing more than outlandish rhetoric, I don't intend to entertain you any further. I have refuted any argument which you may have made in your original post, and it is clearly demonstrated that you indeed violate the Global Rules. Furthermore, I am confident that any person who appeals to logic will agree with my assessment of things.


The Arbitrator - go to this post

Since this response consists of nothing more than outlandish rhetoric, I don't intend to entertain you any further. I have refuted any argument which you may have made in your original post, and it is clearly demonstrated that you indeed violate the Global Rules. Furthermore, I am confident that any person who appeals to logic will agree with my assessment of things.

and hominem to you good sir! don't let the door hit you on the way out.

I love how people never substantiate anything nor feel any need to. They think that saying a bunch of words means they're actually hitting anything vital.
I'm being slapped by a wet noodle or a feather and it just tickles.


There are entire threads of pictures of your messages, not to mention your penis. I think there is plenty of evidence. At this point, it would suit you best to apologize for your actions, and not like the half-assed apology you wrote for the 3 girls on the server. You should apologize to all those who had to put up with you on the server, which is more than just those 3 girls.


KhalafReload - go to this post

There are entire threads of pictures of your messages, not to mention your penis. I think there is plenty of evidence. At this point, it would suit you best to apologize for your actions, and not like the half-assed apology you wrote for the 3 girls on the server. You should apologize to all those who had to put up with you on the server, which is more than just those 3 girls.

I apologized, my apology is that I should be revered and considered the greatest among all of you. That is a valid apology you are just too incompetent to recognize the validity.


This thread is such a fucking mess but it's clear to me that Robert shouldn't be taken seriously and you guys are wasting your time by arguing with him.


My ban will be seen as nothing more than inferiors being insulted for making their inferiority clear


both sides are insane as fuck. you've posted literal pictures of your erections and a video of you staining your table with semen. meanwhile in the eso discord, we're vibing the fuck out and ordering you pizza that you have to pay for. surprised that dominoes hasn't changed their policy of "cash at door". also love how this community is now getting defensive as fuck bcoz you've dug yourself in the hole of being a pedophile. looks like there's no backpedalling for you out of this pit of semen unless you create yourself a new identity (preferably NOT with shavian).

Robert Adamant - go to this post

…
I wouldn't appeal the ban because I already left. Elaine and Grant asked me to go back.
…

LOL! This thread hasn't been edited to censor this yet?


KhalafReload

3 months ago (edited by KhalafReload 3 months ago) Moderator

justin - go to this post

LOL! This thread hasn't been edited to censor this yet?

There isn't anything to be censored. Names of members of the forum? Why would there be any reason to censor this?


Robert Adamant

3 months ago (edited by Robert Adamant 3 months ago)

justin - go to this post

also love how this community is now getting defensive as fuck bcoz you've dug yourself in the hole of being a pedophile.

Young people are talking to me. Pedophile is not the problem people should be worrying about.
I am literally trying to create a religion, talking to very agreeable young women would be the best possible way to do that.
I have no interest in having them genetically reproduce with me, I'm only concerned with them memetically reproducing.
So long as the internet is functional and I have a heartbeat I can spread quickly and globally.


KhalafReload - go to this post

There isn't anything to be censored. Names of members of the forum? Why would there be any reason to censor this?

I've seen accounts get deleted in mere picoseconds when they even mention you-know-who's name. I'm sure you know this by now since you are just a façade for him.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Young people are talking to me. Pedophile is not the problem people should be worrying about.
I am literally trying to create a religion, talking to very agreeable young women would be the best possible way to do that.
I have no interest in having them genetically reproduce with me, I'm only concerned with them memetically reproducing.
So long as the internet is functional and I have a heartbeat I can spread quickly and globally.

..? Please debunk the time you were jacking off naked with a picture of a "young girl" on your screen. You've got a huuuuge erection!


Robert Adamant - go to this post

Pedophile is not the problem people should be worrying about.

We shouldn't be worried that you're a pedophile?


Robert Adamant

3 months ago (edited by Robert Adamant 3 months ago)

justin - go to this post

..? Please debunk the time you were jacking off naked with a picture of a "young girl" on your screen. You've got a huuuuge erection!

it was solicited, in context of the relationship not extreme and private. i have a huge erection because I have a huge cock.

KhalafReload - go to this post

We shouldn't be worried that you're a pedophile?

Because it's a red hearing. Edit: sorry mixed metaphors. Point is it's not the thing that would actually be meaningfully concerning if you wanted to have a productive conversation about any potential wrongdoing.


Hey! You need to log in or create an account to do anything on this forum.

6,228 posts - 1,393 conversations - 1 member online

  • Display avatars