The Arbitrator - go to this post

You were banned from the Discord server for breaking two rules in particular. (The rules which you broke were made public on the Discord server as an explanation for why you were banned.) There is no broad accusation of "doing wrong."

you actually do need to cite a specific grievance otherwise there's no opportunity for reform, just accusations.
I do want to make sure that I don't do something genuinely harmful.
Make a meaningful statement that can help me rather than trying to boost your confidence by trying to just win an argument everyone else has told you is impossible to lose.

The Arbitrator - go to this post

a. Your argument is not only contradictory, but there is no argument to be had…

None of these are accusations that have been brought against me for the purpose of the ban. If you have personal grievances they are between you and me.

The Arbitrator - go to this post

You outright stated that you will make any platform of which you are part a "dating server,"

That was a descriptive appraisal rather than a prescriptive one.
Your entire argument of intent requires that it is prescriptive.

Schizoid Man - go to this post

The difference between you and Socrates is that you are not Socrates.

TRUUUU everything else is exactly the same it's crazy. Same situation different man.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

That was a descriptive appraisal rather than a prescriptive one.

I will take it that you are referring to your own words, which only goes to further justify my claim that you did indeed break the rules and there is demonstrable intent with regard to sex crimes.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

you actually do need to cite a specific grievance otherwise there's no opportunity for reform, just accusations.
I do want to make sure that I don't do something genuinely harmful.
Make a meaningful statement that can help me rather than trying to boost your confidence by trying to just win an argument everyone else has told you is impossible to lose.

In my opinion, you have had too many chances. Winning an argument with you is only impossible to lose because of your inability to carry an argument, not because it is impossible to have an argument in good faith.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

None of these are accusations that have been brought against me for the purpose of the ban. If you have personal grievances they are between you and me.

How are they not directly relevant to the rules which you broke? The subject matter of my post revolves directly around the nature of the rules and how you did indeed violate them. This is nothing more than a contrary argument brought forth with absolutely no reasoning to justify it. How do you reason with this?

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Yes I am referring to my own words. I recognized that the server became something I was not interested in and left.
If I continued to pursue access to the server there would be clear intent.
I did try to get back onto the server but only after people asked me to return because I had no other intent than to listen to my friends.
I stated in the first post here that I do not intend to return even now.

Regardless of whether or not you intend to return, you stated in your original post that you didn't actually break the rules with which you were charged upon being banned from the server, and this is false.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Just because you might believe it is relevant that doesn't mean that it is.

This is a non-sequitur. In fact, many of your responses are a non-sequitur. My personal convictions are irrelevant to the argument at hand, nor did I ever list my personal grievances other than by stating "you have had too many chances," which I made clear was my opinion and nothing more than that.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

On a tautological basis it's false but that's the point of claiming that there was an error.
Like yes if some authority says rules were broken then the rules have been broken.
If I believe that is wrong then I have to argue against the accusation.
It's absurd to assume that simply because someone said something bad happened it must dogmatically be believed.

…except that your violation of the rules is not justified solely by the word of an authority figure. It can be demonstrated how you did indeed break the rules, and I believe that I have aptly demonstrated such. Furthermore, no part of my argument relies upon "someone said something bad happened" other than in where I appeal to the several people who were witness to your posts on the server. There are also screenshots of your posts on the server, so the character of the witnesses, or the fact that there are witnesses, is not the fundamental basis for my statement.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

to a blind man no words are written.

Then you have no purpose for being and I invite you to resign.

1. No maxims will undermine what is obvious to myself and to any others who choose to read and/or partake in this thread.
2. My being is justified by my own convictions, which do exist and yet are not relevant to the nature of this argument, which is about rules that have been written in stone, one of which appeals to the laws of the country in which we both reside.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

I don't have to admit any of your evidence either

You are appealing to a legal system which is not said to exist on this platform. In fact, the judgment is on behalf of the mods and admins based on the logical conclusion of this argument, and I don't think you will ever win an appeal. Your ego prohibits you from actual remorse, and for this reason, nobody is going to want you back on the server.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

If you are concerned with the legality I implore you to help me by giving a better course of reform than "I hate you and I have reason to hate you because I hate you".

Exactly. You've bungled your case. I'm not going to roll over just because everyone else is incompetent. Especially when there's no soft belly of evil I can expose.

Since this response consists of nothing more than outlandish rhetoric, I don't intend to entertain you any further. I have refuted any argument which you may have made in your original post, and it is clearly demonstrated that you indeed violate the Global Rules. Furthermore, I am confident that any person who appeals to logic will agree with my assessment of things.