Does morality truly exist? - Esoteric Chat

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 23:40:39 +0000

justin - go to this post
hey bro where's your two steel balls and jackoff machine?

They're copper balls and it's not a jackoff machine, it's a harem of pubescent girls.
I'm currently trying to sort out how I'm going to manage to fertilize them.

justin

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:58:35 +0000

Robert Adamant - go to this post
It's just objectively unfair to expect you to read all of the books in this picture, a collection I call "Prism of Death" but when answering the question of morality I have found these to be critical for even beginning to have any meaningful discussion.

When I say death it is in reference to 10+ million words of literature.
You simply aren't using the same language as me.
You haven't gone through the effort and you couldn't have known what effort was necessary to establish yourself as seriously concerned.
I don't think you need to talk to all of the various religious groups and read through all of the ancient texts.
I would say that if we're going to have a discussion on morality it would require that you have at least read through what I call "Prism of Death" at least once.
That's logistically possible but it would require an immense investment from you for something that you have no rational cause to dedicate yourself to.
So long as you're concerned with rationality it will never occur that you and I could discuss morality so long as you are unwilling to fully submit to my wisdom without question.
This might seem like an extreme expectation of you but with every robust and time tested system of morality they all require it as do I.

hey bro where's your two steel balls and jackoff machine?

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 05:03:01 +0000

12yearold - go to this post
Nice quote job fuck ass.

thnx <3

12yearold

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 04:55:12 +0000

Nice quote job fuck ass.

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 04:54:43 +0000

Moderation - go to this post
Do not double post use the Edit function.
You have been warned.

New definition then I suppose, Vogon slug.

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post

Moderation

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 04:50:45 +0000

Do not double post use the Edit function.

You have been warned.

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 04:48:36 +0000

It's just objectively unfair to expect you to read all of the books in this picture, a collection I call "Prism of Death" but when answering the question of morality I have found these to be critical for even beginning to have any meaningful discussion.

When I say death it is in reference to 10+ million words of literature.
You simply aren't using the same language as me.
You haven't gone through the effort and you couldn't have known what effort was necessary to establish yourself as seriously concerned.
I don't think you need to talk to all of the various religious groups and read through all of the ancient texts.
I would say that if we're going to have a discussion on morality it would require that you have at least read through what I call "Prism of Death" at least once.
That's logistically possible but it would require an immense investment from you for something that you have no rational cause to dedicate yourself to.
So long as you're concerned with rationality it will never occur that you and I could discuss morality so long as you are unwilling to fully submit to my wisdom without question.
This might seem like an extreme expectation of you but with every robust and time tested system of morality they all require it as do I.

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 04:18:52 +0000

you asked a question, it seemed as though you were expecting a response.
Perhaps you've just learned that anyone who looks to you for a sustained conversation is desperate.

I have spent a lot of time creating a moral framework for myself.
I studied Mormons, Quakers, Scientologists and Jehova's Witnesses by going to their places of worship for months and speaking to the people about their concept of morality. Beyond just that field work I read the quran and both the old and new testaments along with modern texts noted to have "cult followings" for their moralistic themes like The Lord of the Rings, Atlas Shrugged and others.
After a couple of years working through all of this wisdom I collected I found the most effective way of presenting a comprehensive synthesis of this diverse set of beliefs was a set of archetypal sociological beasts along with the concept of adamance.

I can fully understand that there would be skepticism to what I propose simply because no one should so easily submit to someone claiming to have solved the problem of morality more effectively than the thousand monkeys on typewriters have tried to do before. Yet, I insist that this is the case and for you to refute it you would have to read everything I've read and gone to speak with all the people I have and manage to find a different conclusion. It's logistically unreasonable to expect that of you but until then you will simply have to either dismiss me at your own peril and with no valid cause or fully submit also at your peril and again with no valid cause.

The most effective way I could communicate this is saying it is a manifestation of the beast Simia. It's as good as me telling you Bigfoot is real and it's impossible to provide any better evidence in favor of my beast/Beast while also being perfectly impossible to dispute the reality of Simia or Bigfoot.

You're frustrated and the only way to resolve it is either fully denying or fully admitting my position and there cannot ever be any valid argument for or against.

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D.

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 03:45:51 +0000

Robert Adamant - go to this post
not sufficient and a reenforced position based on your second sentence.

It seems as though you're just desperate for the last word despite having absolutely lost the argument. I may humor you with this pittance. However, I would like you to explain what is so insufficient about my statements. My concern for others is quite evident in my interactions with said others. If you can't grasp this then you have no place commenting on a topic as complicated as morality.

Furthermore, I am not the subject of the discussion. Your ideas are in the spotlight as you have decided to present said half-baked ideas as though they meant anything. Are your posts the product of 1,000 monkeys in front of typewriters? I might be convinced to that end and I'm surely not the only one.

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:04:52 +0000

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
I have certainly showed an interest via taking time out of my day to correct your flawed moral ecosystem. Had I no concern or regard for others, why would I bother correcting a flawed worldview, bringing someone closer to the truth?

not sufficient and a reenforced position based on your second sentence.

Moderation

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:47:00 +0000

Robert Adamant - go to this post
𐑿 𐑥𐑳𐑕𐑑 𐑮𐑰𐑥𐑧𐑥𐑚𐑼 𐑑 𐑛𐑲. 𐑨𐑛𐑩𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑕𐑰 𐑦𐑟 𐑑 𐑐𐑮𐑨𐑒𐑑𐑦𐑕 𐑞 𐑫𐑤𐑑𐑦𐑥𐑦𐑑 𐑜𐑵𐑛. 𐑞𐑦𐑕 𐑮𐑰𐑒𐑢𐑲𐑻𐑕 𐑣𐑨𐑝𐑦𐑙 𐑚𐑴𐑔 𐑷𐑛𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑯 𐑑𐑧𐑯𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰. 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑷𐑛𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑦𐑟 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑞 𐑩𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑑 𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑡 𐑞 𐑢𐑻𐑤𐑛 𐑓𐑹 𐑞 𐑜𐑵𐑛 𐑝 𐑘𐑹𐑕𐑧𐑤𐑓. 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑑𐑧𐑯𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑦𐑟 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑞 𐑩𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑑 𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑡 𐑘𐑹𐑕𐑧𐑤𐑓 𐑓𐑹 𐑞 𐑜𐑵𐑛 𐑝 𐑞 𐑢𐑻𐑤𐑛.
𐑞𐑺 𐑸 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑢𐑦𐑗 𐑮𐑧𐑐𐑮𐑦𐑟𐑧𐑯𐑑 𐑞 𐑫𐑤𐑑𐑦𐑥𐑦𐑑 𐑰𐑝𐑦𐑤: 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒. 𐑞𐑴𐑟 𐑣𐑫 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒 𐑢𐑦𐑤 𐑛𐑲 𐑩 𐑞𐑬𐑟𐑨𐑯𐑛 𐑑𐑲𐑥𐑟 𐑢𐑲𐑤 𐑞 𐑨𐑛𐑪𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑑 𐑑𐑱𐑕𐑑 𐑛𐑧𐑔 𐑚𐑳𐑑 𐑢𐑳𐑯𐑕. 𐑞 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑸 𐑩 𐑐𐑮𐑦𐑟𐑦𐑥 𐑞𐑮𐑵 𐑢𐑦𐑗 𐑛𐑧𐑔 𐑒𐑩𐑯 𐑚𐑰 𐑝𐑿𐑧𐑛 𐑦𐑯 𐑣𐑦𐑟 𐑥𐑨𐑯𐑰 𐑓𐑹𐑥𐑟. 𐑞 𐑯𐑱𐑗𐑼 𐑝 𐑞𐑰𐑟 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑸 𐑢𐑩𐑑 𐑚𐑮𐑦𐑙 𐑩𐑚𐑬𐑑 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒. 𐑦𐑑 𐑯𐑰𐑛𐑟 𐑚𐑳𐑑 𐑢𐑳𐑯 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑 𐑑 𐑚𐑮𐑰𐑛 𐑩 𐑢𐑹, 𐑯 𐑞𐑴𐑟 𐑣𐑵 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑯𐑪𐑑 𐑕𐑹𐑛𐑟 𐑒𐑨𐑯 𐑕𐑑𐑦𐑤 𐑛𐑲 𐑳𐑐𐑪𐑯 𐑞𐑧𐑥. 𐑛𐑴𐑯𐑑 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒.
𐑚𐑰𐑒𐑩𐑥𐑦𐑙 𐑨𐑛𐑩𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑑 𐑮𐑰𐑒𐑢𐑲𐑼𐑟 𐑞 𐑩𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑑 𐑚𐑨𐑑𐑤 𐑪𐑤 𐑝 𐑞 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕. 𐑞 𐑥𐑴𐑕𐑑 𐑑𐑮𐑧𐑗𐑻𐑳𐑕 𐑝 𐑞𐑰𐑕 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑦𐑯 𐑯𐑳𐑥𐑚𐑼 𐑸 𐑔𐑻𐑑𐑰𐑯: 𐑕𐑒𐑰𐑻𐑳𐑕, 𐑕𐑑𐑮𐑦𐑒𐑕, 𐑓𐑹𐑥𐑲𐑒𐑩, 𐑤𐑱𐑐𐑳𐑕, 𐑕𐑦𐑥𐑰𐑩, 𐑝𐑫𐑤𐑐𐑦𐑕, 𐑒𐑹𐑝𐑳𐑕, 𐑝𐑦𐑐𐑺𐑩, 𐑮𐑪𐑯𐑩, 𐑤𐑰𐑴, 𐑚𐑩𐑤𐑱𐑯𐑩, 𐑐𐑹𐑒𐑵𐑕 𐑯 𐑑𐑻𐑑𐑻. 𐑪𐑤 𐑝 𐑞 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑢𐑦𐑤 𐑒𐑦𐑤 𐑿 𐑩 𐑞𐑬𐑟𐑨𐑯𐑛 𐑑𐑲𐑥𐑕 𐑚𐑰𐑓𐑹 𐑿 𐑑𐑱𐑒 𐑞 𐑤𐑪𐑙 𐑕𐑤𐑰𐑐 𐑦𐑓 𐑿 𐑸 𐑯𐑪𐑑 𐑨𐑛𐑩𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑑.
𐑑 𐑛𐑵 𐑚𐑨𐑑𐑤 𐑞𐑺 𐑸 𐑓𐑹 𐑕𐑴𐑕𐑲𐑧𐑑𐑰𐑟 𐑝 𐑥𐑨𐑯 𐑞𐑨𐑑 𐑯𐑰𐑛 𐑑 𐑚𐑰 𐑮𐑨𐑤𐑰𐑛. 𐑞𐑰𐑟 𐑕𐑴𐑕𐑲𐑧𐑑𐑰𐑟 𐑝 𐑥𐑨𐑯 𐑸 𐑕𐑐𐑰𐑮𐑦𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟, 𐑦𐑜𐑯𐑦𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟, 𐑭𐑒𐑢𐑩𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟, 𐑯 𐑑𐑺𐑩𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟. 𐑢𐑦𐑔𐑦𐑯 𐑧𐑝𐑮𐑰 𐑕𐑴𐑕𐑲𐑧𐑑𐑰 𐑞𐑺 𐑦𐑟 𐑩 𐑤𐑰𐑛𐑼 𐑣𐑵 𐑣𐑨𐑟 𐑞 𐑮𐑧𐑕𐑐𐑪𐑯𐑕𐑦𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑝 𐑧𐑯𐑠𐑻𐑦𐑙 𐑪𐑤 𐑝 𐑞𐑺 𐑐𐑰𐑐𐑩𐑤 𐑸 𐑒𐑪𐑤𐑥 𐑯 𐑯𐑧𐑝𐑼 𐑓𐑪𐑤 𐑝𐑦𐑒𐑑𐑥 𐑑 𐑚𐑰𐑒𐑳𐑥𐑦𐑙 𐑞 𐑐𐑰𐑐𐑩𐑤 𐑝 𐑩 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑.

Do not post low quality spam please thanks

You have been wanred.

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D.

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:38:32 +0000

Robert Adamant - go to this post
You clearly have no interest in showing how committed you are to making my life as good as possible. It's unfortunate yet predictable.

I have certainly showed an interest via taking time out of my day to correct your flawed moral ecosystem. Had I no concern or regard for others, why would I bother correcting a flawed worldview, bringing someone closer to the truth?

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:35:39 +0000

You clearly have no interest in showing how committed you are to making my life as good as possible. It's unfortunate yet predictable.

Robert Adamant

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:31:49 +0000

had I failed to read all of Plato this would still be entertaining to me.

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D.

Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:06 +0000

Robert Adamant - go to this post
suppose I got my answer

Clearly you fail to understand how a forum works. This isn't text messaging, replies aren't meant to be instantaneous. This is a place where substantive replies are meant to be drafted asynchronously. If you can't be patient, that's too bad. Some people have lives, unlike you, and log in and out at different times of the day.

Robert Adamant - go to this post
Hell yeah

I rest my case.

Robert Adamant - go to this post
(This is a test to see if you're a good faith actor or someone who only has casual convictions)

Hiding behind Shavian is a cowardly attempt at an out for someone who realizes that he has lost. I can read that garbage and I'm not interested in your meaningless ideology with your baseless "beast" concepts and all of that horseshit. You are a bad faith actor because you're attempting to flee the argument by presuming I won't be able to or bother reading your junk that you've intentionally obfuscated. Your convictions are entirely baseless and indefensible which is why you refuse to openly present them in a plainly readable format. You're a coward and you evidently aren't confident enough in your own ideology to present it in the open. You're a disgrace to this forum and you're incapable of conversing at the big boy table. Go back to 4chins or whatever grungy hole you crawled out of.

Furthermore, this is a forum which makes use of the modern Latin alphabet. We are not going to move over to Shavian. You aren't special or cool or esoteric for using a phonetic alphabet that you didn't even make. Grow up.

Robert Adamant

Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:51:23 +0000

suppose I got my answer

Robert Adamant

Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:26:17 +0000

(This is a test to see if you're a good faith actor or someone who only has casual convictions)

Robert Adamant

Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:25:22 +0000

𐑿 𐑥𐑳𐑕𐑑 𐑮𐑰𐑥𐑧𐑥𐑚𐑼 𐑑 𐑛𐑲. 𐑨𐑛𐑩𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑕𐑰 𐑦𐑟 𐑑 𐑐𐑮𐑨𐑒𐑑𐑦𐑕 𐑞 𐑫𐑤𐑑𐑦𐑥𐑦𐑑 𐑜𐑵𐑛. 𐑞𐑦𐑕 𐑮𐑰𐑒𐑢𐑲𐑻𐑕 𐑣𐑨𐑝𐑦𐑙 𐑚𐑴𐑔 𐑷𐑛𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑯 𐑑𐑧𐑯𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰. 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑷𐑛𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑦𐑟 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑞 𐑩𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑑 𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑡 𐑞 𐑢𐑻𐑤𐑛 𐑓𐑹 𐑞 𐑜𐑵𐑛 𐑝 𐑘𐑹𐑕𐑧𐑤𐑓. 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑑𐑧𐑯𐑨𐑕𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑦𐑟 𐑑 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑞 𐑩𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑑 𐑗𐑱𐑯𐑡 𐑘𐑹𐑕𐑧𐑤𐑓 𐑓𐑹 𐑞 𐑜𐑵𐑛 𐑝 𐑞 𐑢𐑻𐑤𐑛.
𐑞𐑺 𐑸 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑢𐑦𐑗 𐑮𐑧𐑐𐑮𐑦𐑟𐑧𐑯𐑑 𐑞 𐑫𐑤𐑑𐑦𐑥𐑦𐑑 𐑰𐑝𐑦𐑤: 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒. 𐑞𐑴𐑟 𐑣𐑫 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒 𐑢𐑦𐑤 𐑛𐑲 𐑩 𐑞𐑬𐑟𐑨𐑯𐑛 𐑑𐑲𐑥𐑟 𐑢𐑲𐑤 𐑞 𐑨𐑛𐑪𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑑 𐑑𐑱𐑕𐑑 𐑛𐑧𐑔 𐑚𐑳𐑑 𐑢𐑳𐑯𐑕. 𐑞 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑸 𐑩 𐑐𐑮𐑦𐑟𐑦𐑥 𐑞𐑮𐑵 𐑢𐑦𐑗 𐑛𐑧𐑔 𐑒𐑩𐑯 𐑚𐑰 𐑝𐑿𐑧𐑛 𐑦𐑯 𐑣𐑦𐑟 𐑥𐑨𐑯𐑰 𐑓𐑹𐑥𐑟. 𐑞 𐑯𐑱𐑗𐑼 𐑝 𐑞𐑰𐑟 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑸 𐑢𐑩𐑑 𐑚𐑮𐑦𐑙 𐑩𐑚𐑬𐑑 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒. 𐑦𐑑 𐑯𐑰𐑛𐑟 𐑚𐑳𐑑 𐑢𐑳𐑯 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑 𐑑 𐑚𐑮𐑰𐑛 𐑩 𐑢𐑹, 𐑯 𐑞𐑴𐑟 𐑣𐑵 𐑣𐑨𐑝 𐑯𐑪𐑑 𐑕𐑹𐑛𐑟 𐑒𐑨𐑯 𐑕𐑑𐑦𐑤 𐑛𐑲 𐑳𐑐𐑪𐑯 𐑞𐑧𐑥. 𐑛𐑴𐑯𐑑 𐑐𐑨𐑯𐑦𐑒.
𐑚𐑰𐑒𐑩𐑥𐑦𐑙 𐑨𐑛𐑩𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑑 𐑮𐑰𐑒𐑢𐑲𐑼𐑟 𐑞 𐑩𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑑 𐑚𐑨𐑑𐑤 𐑪𐑤 𐑝 𐑞 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕. 𐑞 𐑥𐑴𐑕𐑑 𐑑𐑮𐑧𐑗𐑻𐑳𐑕 𐑝 𐑞𐑰𐑕 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑦𐑯 𐑯𐑳𐑥𐑚𐑼 𐑸 𐑔𐑻𐑑𐑰𐑯: 𐑕𐑒𐑰𐑻𐑳𐑕, 𐑕𐑑𐑮𐑦𐑒𐑕, 𐑓𐑹𐑥𐑲𐑒𐑩, 𐑤𐑱𐑐𐑳𐑕, 𐑕𐑦𐑥𐑰𐑩, 𐑝𐑫𐑤𐑐𐑦𐑕, 𐑒𐑹𐑝𐑳𐑕, 𐑝𐑦𐑐𐑺𐑩, 𐑮𐑪𐑯𐑩, 𐑤𐑰𐑴, 𐑚𐑩𐑤𐑱𐑯𐑩, 𐑐𐑹𐑒𐑵𐑕 𐑯 𐑑𐑻𐑑𐑻. 𐑪𐑤 𐑝 𐑞 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑𐑕 𐑢𐑦𐑤 𐑒𐑦𐑤 𐑿 𐑩 𐑞𐑬𐑟𐑨𐑯𐑛 𐑑𐑲𐑥𐑕 𐑚𐑰𐑓𐑹 𐑿 𐑑𐑱𐑒 𐑞 𐑤𐑪𐑙 𐑕𐑤𐑰𐑐 𐑦𐑓 𐑿 𐑸 𐑯𐑪𐑑 𐑨𐑛𐑩𐑥𐑧𐑯𐑑.
𐑑 𐑛𐑵 𐑚𐑨𐑑𐑤 𐑞𐑺 𐑸 𐑓𐑹 𐑕𐑴𐑕𐑲𐑧𐑑𐑰𐑟 𐑝 𐑥𐑨𐑯 𐑞𐑨𐑑 𐑯𐑰𐑛 𐑑 𐑚𐑰 𐑮𐑨𐑤𐑰𐑛. 𐑞𐑰𐑟 𐑕𐑴𐑕𐑲𐑧𐑑𐑰𐑟 𐑝 𐑥𐑨𐑯 𐑸 𐑕𐑐𐑰𐑮𐑦𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟, 𐑦𐑜𐑯𐑦𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟, 𐑭𐑒𐑢𐑩𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟, 𐑯 𐑑𐑺𐑩𐑑𐑹𐑱𐑟. 𐑢𐑦𐑔𐑦𐑯 𐑧𐑝𐑮𐑰 𐑕𐑴𐑕𐑲𐑧𐑑𐑰 𐑞𐑺 𐑦𐑟 𐑩 𐑤𐑰𐑛𐑼 𐑣𐑵 𐑣𐑨𐑟 𐑞 𐑮𐑧𐑕𐑐𐑪𐑯𐑕𐑦𐑚𐑦𐑤𐑦𐑑𐑰 𐑝 𐑧𐑯𐑠𐑻𐑦𐑙 𐑪𐑤 𐑝 𐑞𐑺 𐑐𐑰𐑐𐑩𐑤 𐑸 𐑒𐑪𐑤𐑥 𐑯 𐑯𐑧𐑝𐑼 𐑓𐑪𐑤 𐑝𐑦𐑒𐑑𐑥 𐑑 𐑚𐑰𐑒𐑳𐑥𐑦𐑙 𐑞 𐑐𐑰𐑐𐑩𐑤 𐑝 𐑩 𐑚𐑰𐑕𐑑.

Robert Adamant

Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:23:11 +0000

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
This is nothing more than a rationalization of your ravenous sex drive.

Hell yeah

Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D.

Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:17:25 +0000

Robert Adamant - go to this post
You propose as a framework of morality to be that you ignore all threats at risk of being too scared to think clearly.
Perhaps you are in one such frenzy right now and cannot in good faith offer anything but my condolences for seeing the horrors of reality for the first time in your life.

Notice that I didn't propose any framework of morality. I criticized yours and tore it down. Any such assertions to the contrary stem entirety from your frightened imagination.

Furthermore, I am connected with reality on a far deeper level than you will ever be. You're concerned only with superficial aspects of reality which in the end are utterly irrelevant. This is nothing more than a rationalization of your ravenous sex drive. Once again, pathetic.

Robert Adamant - go to this post
There's no contradiction. Someone who forgets that they must die will neglect to consider how they wish to die. When you have a concern for a good death many other more horrible deaths are much more terrifying and clearer to avoid.

You're further contradicting yourself. Is it avoidance of death or is it choosing a manner of death? Those are two mutually exclusive ideas. What makes one death terrifying and another not when the nature of death is that it all leads to the same end regardless.

Robert Adamant - go to this post
Defense is the nature of discussion. Becoming defensive is a movement of combat and I am not ashamed for giving you the respect of an opponent but perhaps it is too much for you to bring conflict into your life

I'm not referring to rational defense. I'm referring to your becoming emotionally enflamed and flustered over a simple discussion. It's as though I've offended your very sense of self. This is immature behavior, and has no place in logical discourse. You've closed yourself off and now you're trying to protect your fragile ego regardless of how much of an ass you make of yourself in the process.

Robert Adamant - go to this post
you ought to resign on those grounds

You ought to cease replying out of the embarrassment of your own positions. The merit of your very own posts is enough to abandon this forum altogether, my own posts not even considered for sake of argument. I need not even argue against your points to illustrate your folly, you achieve this of your own accord.