The reality of sexuality is that women are the most sexual people.
They are projecting how sexual they are on men.
The reason why most people think women are not sexual is because they are only so with very few people.
As women become more powerful and have their sexuality more accepted men have to become undesirable in order to avoid being pursued.
When the most desirable men lower their standards for themselves to nothing all of the other men begin to think that's just how one is supposed to act.
I have decided to hold myself to a high standard.
Men are definitely more sexual in nature than women. Sexual perversion is more common among men, especially online. This doesn't mean that women can't be sexual, though.
Speciality - go to this post
Men are definitely more sexual in nature than women.
You don't know this because you're not in any groups that are exclusively male but when that happens there isn't any discussion of sex.
No one is talking about sex at the chess club, it is a notoriously male kind of environment and also notoriously asexual.
This is what the most popular female chess player looks like:
we need to bring back witch hunts and start killing women for showing too much skin or talking about sex with anyone other than their husband in private and only rarely.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
we need to bring back witch hunts and start killing women for showing too much skin or talking about sex with anyone other than their husband in private and only rarely.
This is rlly weird :-3
KmfdmLover - go to this post
This is rlly weird :-3
The thing is he's right, though.
I don't care to reply to the one post made in response to me because it's stupid. This conversation is stupid.
The way that woman was dressing has nothing to do with sex, or being sexual, for that nature. It's just extremely revealing clothing, but that's not inherently sexual. Exposing the human body is not inherently sexual.
Speciality - go to this post
Exposing the human body is not inherently sexual.
anker - go to this post
Speciality - go to this post
Exposing the human body is not inherently sexual.
Correct, exposure itself is not sexual, this isn't Japan where seeing genitals means it's sexual.
It's a teleological consideration. What is the function of the nudity?
I don't generally think the purpose MMA fighters have for getting nude is for the sake of presenting sexually.
It's actually one of the sports where women consistently wear more clothes than the men.
Imagine that, an extremely masculine sport and it's more conservative about women's bodies.
Copyright ยฉ MMXXIV Esoteric Chat. Some rights reserved. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. ยง 230: All posts on this site are the sole responsibility of their posters.
6,142 posts - 1,371 conversations - 1 member online