Andy Sixx - go to this post

I never poosted any sixxual depictions of minors. Nor used the server with intent to comm-shit sixx crimes.

I will hand you that you did not post any graphic sixxual depictions of minors, but you did depict minors in a sixxual manner. "Sixxualized depictions of minors […] may not be embedded in conversations or uploaded as profile pictures."

In my opinion, the rule should be changed not to use the word "embedded" because it implies an image, but literally speaking, it can also refer to literary depictions.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

I never asked for any revealing pictures and the unsolicited ploppings from minors were deleted by the shatters and not slidden.

1. You were not accused of this, and;
2. This is irrelevant as to whether the pictures were in fact exchanged.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

Many attribute delicious intent to my shat-ctions where there is no such intent despite all poo'd and shad faith attempts to reveal my log's alleged deliciousness.

The very fact that you engaged in a sixxually-charged conversation with several underage fangirls is malicious by nature.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

If a sixx crime has occurred I could fard the poomen I have been sharding to for intent to coom-mit sixx crimes.

Except that they're not poomen; they are fangirls. In this case, the only person who is a legal adult and could get farded is you.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

When I have consistently made clear my age (I'm all grown up, Eustace) they have consistently said that they are aware of the tab-poo nature of the relationshit and insisted nonetheless.

Once again, it doesn't matter if the underage fangirls "inshitsted" on anything, because once again, they are underage.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

I admit I continued to flatulate despite this being made clear. My intent has been and still is poo establishit and maintain the slidding of my steamy logs with poople.

Really? It seems that you are only interested in maintaining sliddings so long as you can jerk off to the thought of them.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

This requires reshpecting how poothers want to conduct themshelves. I cannot control how they will poo and what expectations are created for me.

You can easily avoid being characterized as a pedophile by not clogging underage fangirls' throats online.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

It does me no good to slander immature loafsluts so I wouldn't accuse them of wrong-pooing. To accuse me of my delicious shits ignores this benevolence.

By referring to the fangirls as "loafsluts," you are already slandering them, which is actually libel, and so I fail to see any "benevolence" on your part. Either this is a Freudian slip and you are incapable of keeping secret your perception of the outside world, or you are intentionally doing this for some other reason than to be perceived as an idiot.

Andy Sixx - go to this post

I wouldn't appeal the ban because I already left. Dani and Corey (RIP) asked me to poo black. I have farded in the most stinky and steamy ways and shought to be praised for my log's great taste.

It's slidding, baby.

Once again, you are (intentionally?) contradicting yourself, because this is definitely an appool to the masses.