You are a pedophile, or a minor-attracted person, or whatever you would like to call it in order to avoid the fact that you predate upon children. However, this is not the most important part of your post, at least to me; everybody should know by now that you're a creep, at least. I find it interesting that you are congratulating what is essentially a jurisdictional oversight–a legal loophole–while also promoting a kind of ideology that would not allow for such loopholes to take place. What I mean by this is that you appeal to righteousness instead of reason, and so I can definitely state that, if given the authority to rule on such matters, which you never should have, you would attempt to gloss over the legal and procedural constraints of serving to an individual what you believe to be just. In any ideal world, these jurisdictional matters would be of no consequence to the fact that the person has done something wrong.

But, alas, this is not the end to your hypocrisy.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

In court it's routinely found pedophilia is very rarely the kind of serious sex crime like someone raping a 5 year old, recording it and then selling the video to people.

Pedophilia is objectionable because it promulgates the very kind of abusive behavior that is found by the act of molesting children. So, if you believe that molesting a child is morally objectionable, you should also object to the consumption of material which depicts behavior you supposedly find objectionable rather than mount a defense of its treatment by the (corrupt and backwards) republic courts who do not seek out the appropriate degree of punishment in its wake.

I disagree with your insinuation that pedophilia is "overreacted" upon by the public court of opinion. Rather, there are many such cases in which acts of pedophilia are looked over so long as they are being performed in the name of ritual (see the Jews) or by celebrities, most of whom end up being involved in Jewry. Do I call every man a pedophile? No, and if that were the case, and pedophiles did indeed comprise most of the population, then how and why would people overreact to its practice? And, finally, you have employed sophistry in order to obfuscate your (very weak) "argument" that pedophilia is unserious, by conflating pedophilia with natural sexual desire, when it is in fact established that the fetishization of underage girls is the result of degeneracy rather than a recoil of natural sexual tendencies.

If you are willing to contend that the social behavior of humans may evolve in the way that our physical bodies do, then it should be observable (at least at the most basic level) that the reproductive tendencies of humans have favored older women rather than younger ones in the wake of the Industrial Revolution, among other events that ultimately culminate in this change of behavior. Instead, you are acting sore that people do not recognize your fetish as normal nor is it defensible and, as a result of your inability to recognize your own faults, have churned out this (rather pitiful) reaction to a news event.