- Members allowed to view this conversation
- Everyone
- ‹ Previous First
-
unread60-72 of 72 posts
- Last Next ›
Then don't say your perspective doesn't matter, it invalidates everything you say.
But if you say perspective matters all of the sudden guess I'm right.
For some reason you don't want to let that happen and you're willing to invalidate everything you've said to avoid letting me be right.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
Then don't say your perspective doesn't matter, it invalidates everything you say.
Once again, we are not discussing perspective. Never once did I say anything about perspective. It seems you're arguing in circles because you're too cowardly to bring the topic back to your defense of your viewpoint, as you are unable to defend it. I have won. You may have the last word as it seems that is very important to you, so long as you concede my victory and your defeat. Your viewpoints are baseless, arbitrary, and you are an animal with no morality. Trying to codify animalistic impulses and emotions is not morality.
Ok so you do hold the position that specifically morality does not exist for me.
The validity of a statement isn't proven by your ability to continue to hold it.
You have won the title of random person who claims one other random person is amoral.
This claim will likely never be all that groundbreaking as it is made constantly and can't ever really be verified.
For our next competition we will see who can believe that aliens don't exist the longest.
Are you interested in competing? I'm not and likely no one else will challenge you but you're free to compete.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
Ok so you do hold the position that specifically morality does not exist for me.
The validity of a statement isn't proven by your ability to continue to hold it.
You have won the title of random person who claims one other random person is amoral.
This claim will likely never be all that groundbreaking as it is made constantly and can't ever really be verified.
The validity of my statement has been proven, though. Your basis for morality consists of nothing more than codification of instinct and thus you are mistaking your own impulses for morality. Anyone can clearly see that the morality you've presented in your own defense simply does not constitute morality. If you've really studied morality as defined by various philosophers and cultures, you should know that your own so-called morality doesn't fit the bill for what morality is.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
For our next competition we will see who can believe that aliens don't exist the longest.
Are you interested in competing? I'm not and likely no one else will challenge you but you're free to compete.
Aliens have been proven to exist and anybody who claims otherwise will simply fall victim to public ridicule. It would be a pointless endeavor.
Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
The validity of my statement has been proven, though. Your basis for morality consists of nothing more than codification of instinct and thus you are mistaking your own impulses for morality. Anyone can clearly see that the morality you've presented in your own defense simply does not constitute morality. If you've really studied morality as defined by various philosophers and cultures, you should know that your own so-called morality doesn't fit the bill for what morality is.
>your basis of morality
you admit I have a basis of morality and still attempt to say I am amoral.
>your own so-called morality doesn't fit the bill for what morality is.
Yeah that's what happens when you figure things out yourself.
Perhaps you have never been creative ever in your life which would make such a state foreign to you.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
>your basis of morality
you admit I have a basis of morality and still attempt to say I am amoral.>your own so-called morality doesn't fit the bill for what morality is.
Yeah that's what happens when you figure things out yourself.
Perhaps you have never been creative ever in your life which would make such a state foreign to you.
No, your basis for morality is flawed to the point that you have only the illusion of morality. You claim that you "figure things out yourself" yet earlier you proudly exclaimed that you did research and based your ideas upon the works and writings of others. So which is it? I've seen nothing but contradictions and illogical proclamations from you this entire time. It seems you're incapable of holding your side of an argument. Log out, nigga. You're cooked.
Like there's no way you're saying anything meaningful about morality to say that one specific framework is suspicious on the grounds that it was made by an animal.
Perhaps if you were to criticize a broader or more established system of morality greater discussion could be had.
Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
No, your basis for morality is flawed to the point that you have only the illusion of morality. You claim that you "figure things out yourself" yet earlier you proudly exclaimed that you did research and based your ideas upon the works and writings of others. So which is it? I've seen nothing but contradictions and illogical proclamations from you this entire time. It seems you're incapable of holding your side of an argument. Log out, nigga. You're cooked.
Yeah figuring things out means looking at what other people have done and seeing what they might have gotten wrong by creating something else that works better.
It would be really weird if an physicist spent their entire life alone in a room pondering the universe and managed to achieve the same precise models as we have today from centuries of people contributing to the field.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
Like there's no way you're saying anything meaningful about morality to say that one specific framework is suspicious on the grounds that it was made by an animal.
Perhaps if you were to criticize a broader or more established system of morality greater discussion could be had.
Why should a system of morality devised by an animal be taken into acceptance? Indeed, one of the distinctions between man and beast is morality. Hence, animals cannot, by virtue of definition, formulate morality. Therefore, if you are an animal, anything you put forth which you call morality is not, in fact, morality. This seems rather easy to grasp upon cursory examination of this conversation.
- ‹ Previous First
-
unread60-72 of 72 posts
- Last Next ›
Copyright ยฉ MMXXV Esoteric Chat. Some rights reserved. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. ยง 230: All posts on this site are the sole responsibility of their posters.
4,758 posts - 1,411 conversations - 0 members online