had I failed to read all of Plato this would still be entertaining to me.
You clearly have no interest in showing how committed you are to making my life as good as possible. It's unfortunate yet predictable.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
You clearly have no interest in showing how committed you are to making my life as good as possible. It's unfortunate yet predictable.
I have certainly showed an interest via taking time out of my day to correct your flawed moral ecosystem. Had I no concern or regard for others, why would I bother correcting a flawed worldview, bringing someone closer to the truth?
Robert Adamant - go to this post
๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ณ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ผ ๐ ๐๐ฒ. ๐จ๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐จ๐๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐ค๐๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ต๐. ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ข๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ด๐ ๐ท๐๐จ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ฏ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐จ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฐ. ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ท๐๐จ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฏ๐ก ๐ ๐ข๐ป๐ค๐ ๐๐น ๐ ๐๐ต๐ ๐ ๐๐น๐๐ง๐ค๐. ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐จ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ฏ๐ก ๐๐น๐๐ง๐ค๐ ๐๐น ๐ ๐๐ต๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ป๐ค๐.
๐๐บ ๐ธ ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐ค๐๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ฆ๐ค: ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐. ๐๐ด๐ ๐ฃ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ค ๐๐ฒ ๐ฉ ๐๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐ฒ๐ค ๐ ๐จ๐๐ช๐ฅ๐ง๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ณ๐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฏ๐. ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐ธ ๐ฉ ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐๐ฎ๐ต ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฉ๐ฏ ๐๐ฐ ๐๐ฟ๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐ฐ ๐๐น๐ฅ๐. ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฑ๐๐ผ ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐ธ ๐ข๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐. ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐๐ณ๐ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฏ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฉ ๐ข๐น, ๐ฏ ๐๐ด๐ ๐ฃ๐ต ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ฏ๐ช๐ ๐๐น๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ฏ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ค ๐๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐ช๐ฏ ๐๐ง๐ฅ. ๐๐ด๐ฏ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐.
๐๐ฐ๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ๐จ๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ง๐ฏ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ข๐ฒ๐ผ๐ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ค ๐ช๐ค ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐. ๐ ๐ฅ๐ด๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ป๐ณ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฏ๐ณ๐ฅ๐๐ผ ๐ธ ๐๐ป๐๐ฐ๐ฏ: ๐๐๐ฐ๐ป๐ณ๐, ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐, ๐๐น๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ฉ, ๐ค๐ฑ๐๐ณ๐, ๐๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฉ, ๐๐ซ๐ค๐๐ฆ๐, ๐๐น๐๐ณ๐, ๐๐ฆ๐๐บ๐ฉ, ๐ฎ๐ช๐ฏ๐ฉ, ๐ค๐ฐ๐ด, ๐๐ฉ๐ค๐ฑ๐ฏ๐ฉ, ๐๐น๐๐ต๐ ๐ฏ ๐๐ป๐๐ป. ๐ช๐ค ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ค ๐๐ฆ๐ค ๐ฟ ๐ฉ ๐๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐น ๐ฟ ๐๐ฑ๐ ๐ ๐ค๐ช๐ ๐๐ค๐ฐ๐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฟ ๐ธ ๐ฏ๐ช๐ ๐จ๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ง๐ฏ๐.
๐ ๐๐ต ๐๐จ๐๐ค ๐๐บ ๐ธ ๐๐น ๐๐ด๐๐ฒ๐ง๐๐ฐ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ ๐๐จ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฐ ๐ฎ๐จ๐ค๐ฐ๐. ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐๐ด๐๐ฒ๐ง๐๐ฐ๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ ๐ธ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐น๐ฑ๐, ๐ฆ๐๐ฏ๐ฆ๐๐น๐ฑ๐, ๐ญ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐๐น๐ฑ๐, ๐ฏ ๐๐บ๐ฉ๐๐น๐ฑ๐. ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ง๐๐ฎ๐ฐ ๐๐ด๐๐ฒ๐ง๐๐ฐ ๐๐บ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฉ ๐ค๐ฐ๐๐ผ ๐ฃ๐ต ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ช๐ฏ๐๐ฆ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฐ ๐ ๐ง๐ฏ๐ ๐ป๐ฆ๐ ๐ช๐ค ๐ ๐๐บ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฉ๐ค ๐ธ ๐๐ช๐ค๐ฅ ๐ฏ ๐ฏ๐ง๐๐ผ ๐๐ช๐ค ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ณ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฉ๐ค ๐ ๐ฉ ๐๐ฐ๐๐.
Do not post low quality spam please thanks
Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
I have certainly showed an interest via taking time out of my day to correct your flawed moral ecosystem. Had I no concern or regard for others, why would I bother correcting a flawed worldview, bringing someone closer to the truth?
not sufficient and a reenforced position based on your second sentence.
Robert Adamant - go to this post
not sufficient and a reenforced position based on your second sentence.
It seems as though you're just desperate for the last word despite having absolutely lost the argument. I may humor you with this pittance. However, I would like you to explain what is so insufficient about my statements. My concern for others is quite evident in my interactions with said others. If you can't grasp this then you have no place commenting on a topic as complicated as morality.
Furthermore, I am not the subject of the discussion. Your ideas are in the spotlight as you have decided to present said half-baked ideas as though they meant anything. Are your posts the product of 1,000 monkeys in front of typewriters? I might be convinced to that end and I'm surely not the only one.
you asked a question, it seemed as though you were expecting a response.
Perhaps you've just learned that anyone who looks to you for a sustained conversation is desperate.
I have spent a lot of time creating a moral framework for myself.
I studied Mormons, Quakers, Scientologists and Jehova's Witnesses by going to their places of worship for months and speaking to the people about their concept of morality. Beyond just that field work I read the quran and both the old and new testaments along with modern texts noted to have "cult followings" for their moralistic themes like The Lord of the Rings, Atlas Shrugged and others.
After a couple of years working through all of this wisdom I collected I found the most effective way of presenting a comprehensive synthesis of this diverse set of beliefs was a set of archetypal sociological beasts along with the concept of adamance.
I can fully understand that there would be skepticism to what I propose simply because no one should so easily submit to someone claiming to have solved the problem of morality more effectively than the thousand monkeys on typewriters have tried to do before. Yet, I insist that this is the case and for you to refute it you would have to read everything I've read and gone to speak with all the people I have and manage to find a different conclusion. It's logistically unreasonable to expect that of you but until then you will simply have to either dismiss me at your own peril and with no valid cause or fully submit also at your peril and again with no valid cause.
The most effective way I could communicate this is saying it is a manifestation of the beast Simia. It's as good as me telling you Bigfoot is real and it's impossible to provide any better evidence in favor of my beast/Beast while also being perfectly impossible to dispute the reality of Simia or Bigfoot.
You're frustrated and the only way to resolve it is either fully denying or fully admitting my position and there cannot ever be any valid argument for or against.
It's just objectively unfair to expect you to read all of the books in this picture, a collection I call "Prism of Death" but when answering the question of morality I have found these to be critical for even beginning to have any meaningful discussion.
When I say death it is in reference to 10+ million words of literature.
You simply aren't using the same language as me.
You haven't gone through the effort and you couldn't have known what effort was necessary to establish yourself as seriously concerned.
I don't think you need to talk to all of the various religious groups and read through all of the ancient texts.
I would say that if we're going to have a discussion on morality it would require that you have at least read through what I call "Prism of Death" at least once.
That's logistically possible but it would require an immense investment from you for something that you have no rational cause to dedicate yourself to.
So long as you're concerned with rationality it will never occur that you and I could discuss morality so long as you are unwilling to fully submit to my wisdom without question.
This might seem like an extreme expectation of you but with every robust and time tested system of morality they all require it as do I.
Do not double post use the Edit function.
Moderation - go to this post
Do not double post use the Edit function.
You have been warned.
New definition then I suppose, Vogon slug.
Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
Dr. Gene Ray, Ph.D. - go to this post
Nice quote job fuck ass.
12yearold - go to this post
Nice quote job fuck ass.
thnx <3
Robert Adamant - go to this post
It's just objectively unfair to expect you to read all of the books in this picture, a collection I call "Prism of Death" but when answering the question of morality I have found these to be critical for even beginning to have any meaningful discussion.
When I say death it is in reference to 10+ million words of literature.
You simply aren't using the same language as me.
You haven't gone through the effort and you couldn't have known what effort was necessary to establish yourself as seriously concerned.
I don't think you need to talk to all of the various religious groups and read through all of the ancient texts.
I would say that if we're going to have a discussion on morality it would require that you have at least read through what I call "Prism of Death" at least once.
That's logistically possible but it would require an immense investment from you for something that you have no rational cause to dedicate yourself to.
So long as you're concerned with rationality it will never occur that you and I could discuss morality so long as you are unwilling to fully submit to my wisdom without question.
This might seem like an extreme expectation of you but with every robust and time tested system of morality they all require it as do I.
hey bro where's your two steel balls and jackoff machine?
justin - go to this post
hey bro where's your two steel balls and jackoff machine?
They're copper balls and it's not a jackoff machine, it's a harem of pubescent girls.
I'm currently trying to sort out how I'm going to manage to fertilize them.
Copyright ยฉ MMXXIV Esoteric Chat. Some rights reserved. Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. ยง 230: All posts on this site are the sole responsibility of their posters.
5,978 posts - 1,327 conversations - 1 member online