I'm trying to create a framework for the ideal personal values.
I find a concern with the degrees of subjective mortality and vulnerability produces a compelling set of personality traits.
I've created this chart to illustrate how I believe someone's perceived mortality and vulnerability would lead them to conduct themselves.

The most instructive thing I could see about this is how changing your personal perspective on these axees allows for more deliberate self actualization.
If this is actually an effective framework for that I would then assume that it is an effective way of understanding what motivates personality.

LindyMan - go to this post

I would argue that heroism belongs at V-M rather than pragmatism, and the two should be switched. Pragmatism is more in line with creativity.

It's really hard to put in creative, pragmatic, honorable and heroic in the quadrants because they have specific connotations for every person.
What I'm glad about at least is that the ideas of V-IM and the like are likely understood in the same way between us.
I have Heroic in V-IM because of how I imagine the most heroic character Jesus Christ Savior of the World because he was always able to heal people but was still vulnerable.
Without that vulnerability he isn't taking a risk and isn't as heroic any more and is just deciding how the world ought to be like the Creator of the Universe God the Father.
Probably should have given my reasoning for placement.
Just couldn't figure out how to word all of this stuff much less explain the most bold point which was to associate major religions with each quadrant.
I'll do it anyway but I have only really figured out how the explain my placement of Judaism (IV-IM) and Christianity (V-IM) while I don't totally know how to explain why Islam (IV-M) would be in the quadrant it is in and why Zoroastrianism would be major enough to place in the V-M quadrant much less how to explain that placement.

KmfdmLover - go to this post

What does this even mean?

stop making it so obvious you're a woman by talking ever.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

It's really hard to put in creative, pragmatic, honorable and heroic in the quadrants because they have specific connotations for every person.

So then it's not really a good idea to map this into quadrants because it's too abstract.

Schizoid Man - go to this post

So then it's not really a good idea to map this into quadrants because it's too abstract.

That is true of every set of ideas that wasn't just a permutation of "IV-IM".
Shit idk what is with me but I keep on just saying only half of my ideas.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

That is true of every set of ideas that wasn't just a permutation of "IV-IM".
Shit idk what is with me but I keep on just saying only half of my ideas.

Maybe you shouldn't speak at all, then.

Robert Adamant - go to this post

I'm trying to create a framework for the ideal personal values.
I find a concern with the degrees of subjective mortality and vulnerability produces a compelling set of personality traits.
I've created this chart to illustrate how I believe someone's perceived mortality and vulnerability would lead them to conduct themselves.

The most instructive thing I could see about this is how changing your personal perspective on these axees allows for more deliberate self actualization.
If this is actually an effective framework for that I would then assume that it is an effective way of understanding what motivates personality.

fuk u

Robert Adamant - go to this post

Or I should stop deciding that you're too incompetent to handle the full idea with seriousness.

although I'm retarded by this retard in pursuing that.

Ok Akefu. Keep on spewing word salad in a last-ditch attempt to defend yourself.